Fwd: User bus conclusion

[Thiago Macieira]

On Wednesday, 10 de November de 2010 22:42:53 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Em Quarta-feira, 10 de Novembro de 2010, às 17:13:20, David Faure
> 
> escreveu:
> > > Yes for daemons a user bus sounds good. But not for anything with a
> > > GUI - e.g. you wouldn't be able to run any kuniqueapplication
> > > twice (once on each display), since the bus would tell it "you're
> > > already running".
> > 
> > Think about it: some of the kuniqueapplications must be relying on
> > their uniqueness to access resources that mustn't be shared. Not all
> > of them will have additional locks like kmail does.
> 
> Well, then those "unique" applications need to be fixed. $HOME on
> network shares is a reality and, judging from complaints on the KDE PIM
> mailing lists, people do start a KDE session on a second computer
> without first logging out of a KDE session running on another computer.

Indeed. That's a good point right there.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
  Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
      PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
      E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20101111/207f6939/attachment.sig>