Review Request: function.cpp: 290: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions
Guy Maurel
guy-kde at maurel.de
Mon Oct 12 18:52:16 BST 2009
> On 2009-10-12 15:16:58, Maksim Orlovich wrote:
> > Why not just change the signature and adjust the caller? This isn't a public API.
OK, these ist the best.
see: scriptfunction-gm-5.diff
- Guy
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1828/#review2614
-----------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-10-12 17:51:52, Guy Maurel wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1828/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 2009-10-12 17:51:52)
>
>
> Review request for kdelibs.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> The kdelibs-Dashboard reports:
> /.../kdelibs/kjs/function.cpp:290: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions
>
> at the line
> Identifier FunctionImp::getParameterName(int index)
>
> my proposal ist to introduce a local variable, make a proper definition of pos
> see the attachted patch.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kjs/function.cpp 1033934
> /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kjs/scriptfunction.h 1033934
>
> Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1828/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> at home
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Guy
>
>
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list