Bugreporting barrier is too low with the new Dr. Konqi

[Matt Rogers]

On Monday 02 November 2009 15:34:20 Shaun Reich wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Albert Astals Cid <aacid at kde.org> wrote:
> > A Dilluns, 2 de novembre de 2009, Andreas Pakulat va escriure:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> it seems like the bugreporting barrier is too low now that Dr. Konqi has
> >> a "report this bug" button. In particular users are not presented with a
> >> list of possible duplicate reports according to the backtrace
> >> information and reproduction steps they supplied.
> >
> > Last time i reported a but using the new Dr Konqi i think i got a list of
> > duplicate reports.
> >
> > Albert
> 
> Likewise. Although I think it was easily skippable, last time I had to use
>  it. The duplicate checker actually is pretty nice, along with other
> aspects, and in my opinion better than BKO. But that's coming from a
> person who hates BKO.
> 

Knowing what you hate about BKO (private mail is fine for this) would help. 
This will let me actually work on fixing it. :)
-- 
Matt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20091103/27a67bed/attachment.sig>