overhaul of some kcm appearance

[Oswald Buddenhagen]

On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:00:02AM +0100, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Saturday 14 March 2009 20:48:20 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > which part of "plasma" in "libplasma" exactly does not suggest that
> > it was put into kdelibs for the convenience of developing plasma
> > applications?
> 
> Read Amarok's source code, as a prominent example. Valid or not by
> your definition of a "plasma application".
> 
well, if they can make good use of bigger parts of the lib, then the
better - for them. this doesn't change the principle, though.

> > if it wasn't meant that way, then something went thoroughly wrong.
> > [...]
> 
> This is not constructive anymore and offensive to some people.
>
i'm sorry for you that you seemingly don't understand the merit of this
criticism. i in turn find it inconstructive that you are trying to shut
it down by pulling the "be-nice" card.

> You provide exactly no exact information.
>
i'm assuming that everyone understands the cost of loading big libraries
with cold disk caches. if you still don't see my point with this
background, then i can't help you.