Accelerators missing from dialogs in KDE 4.3
coolo at kde.org
Tue Jul 28 12:37:51 BST 2009
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 20:08:22 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Dimarts, 28 de juliol de 2009, Stephan Kulow va escriure:
> > Am Montag 27 Juli 2009 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> > > What's the benefit of a dummy marker over a correctly positioned
> > > marked?
> > I say it again: "history proved that it's impossible for a developer and
> > even less possible for a translator to pick accelerators that do not
> > clash all the time."
> I agree picking non clashing accelerators is impossible, that's why i want
> b) Try to add as much accelerators in code as possible but leave the
> automatic accelerator enabled so that it somehow works if the developer is
> not careful enough AND resolves the clashing that may exist
> This has the advantage over dummy accelerator that if there is no clash the
> accelerator is as meaningful as possible rather than a random selected one
> by the algorithm.
That doesn't really solve the asian's translators problem though. The
algorithm will as of now only remove the accelerator from (&S) - and then it
will look rather silly :)
Not a problem to the latin translator - nor to the developer. So my suggestion
is: put real accelerators only where they really matter to be consistent and
mark up the others so the algorithm has a chance to help _everyone_.
More information about the kde-core-devel