kdereview exemption for PolicyKit-KDE

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Sunday 16 November 2008, Trever Fischer wrote:
> On Sunday 16 November 2008 08:33:38 am Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > On Sunday 16 of November 2008, Trever Fischer wrote:
> >
> >  Is this about the code on which I worked few weeks back to get it from
> > doesn't-really-do-anything to hopefully-kind-of-works (and occassionally
> > guessed and so in the process, since PolicyKit happens to have nice
> > extensive and useless API docs)? I rather disagree with an exception for
> > this. What does currently depend on PolicyKit anyway?
>
> Maybe, but now its in a state of it-just-works-with-minor-bugs.

what are these minor bugs?

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20081116/f420adfe/attachment.sig>