kdereview exemption for PolicyKit-KDE

[Trever Fischer]

On Sunday 16 November 2008 06:37:59 pm Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Sunday 16 November 2008, Trever Fischer wrote:
> > On Sunday 16 November 2008 08:33:38 am Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > > On Sunday 16 of November 2008, Trever Fischer wrote:
> > >
> > >  Is this about the code on which I worked few weeks back to get it from
> > > doesn't-really-do-anything to hopefully-kind-of-works (and
> > > occassionally guessed and so in the process, since PolicyKit happens to
> > > have nice extensive and useless API docs)? I rather disagree with an
> > > exception for this. What does currently depend on PolicyKit anyway?
> >
> > Maybe, but now its in a state of it-just-works-with-minor-bugs.
>
> what are these minor bugs?
The ones off the top of my head I can recall are it not properly grouping items 
in the display list, some incorrect assumptions about dbus calls that lead to 
crashes, a random freeze on the 'modify' button, and some strings that, imho, 
could be changed to make more sense. And those TODOs in the source.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20081116/82052829/attachment.sig>