Release schedule clarifications

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Wednesday 24 October 2007, Torsten Rahn wrote:
> Judging from the experience we gained there I'd like to support the idea of
> labeling workspace + apps "BETA 4" while labeling the API/plattform RC1.

i'm in favour of this as well.

> I'd also like to point out that so far KDE 2.0 was certainly our most
> problematic release. However even for that one the participation of
> enthusiasts was a whole lot better. KDE 2 RC1 still had rough edges (more
> so than any other release until KDE 4). KDE 4 on the other hand still has
> got a lot of holes (calling it "rough edges" would be euphemism) in

...

> That all being said the late progress especially with regard to plasma has
> been totally amazing.

after beating someone about the head, it's always a good idea to give them a 
good hug just to make sure they don't come back to repay your for your 
treatment.

i'm just surprised you couldn't find more ways to repeat your point without 
making any actually substantial comments. i only counted 7 repetitions of the 
same idea without additional substantial content. =P

> However we should

ah, one more for the road. luv you too, tackat.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Trolltech
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20071024/dac1e391/attachment.sig>