4.0 -> 4.1 binary compatibility

[Michael Pyne]

On Wednesday 24 October 2007, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Calling the latest release a beta3 isn't very honest either, IMHO (or
> the upcoming a beta4), besides the good progres that has been made in
> the last weeks. Seriously, such big changes as the KConfig stuff that
> just happened doesn't really cry "hey I'm nearly a release candidate,
> i.e. a version that is going to be released until very important
> problems arise".

Well frankly I agree, but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.  Just 
because we started calling KDE 4 beta too early doesn't mean it's time to 
call binary incompatible libraries the same major version.

Regards,
 - Michael Pyne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20071024/6ae5d317/attachment.sig>