KParts::ComponentFactory to namespace?

[Alex Merry]

Is it OK to make KParts::ComponentFactory into a namespace, to stop 
anyone trying to instantiate it?

It just has five static template methods and, given the existence of 
KParts::Factory, I can't imagine that there'll be any need to make it 
into a real class at any point.

Alex


-- 
KDE: http://www.kde.org
Ubuntu/Kubuntu: http://www.ubuntu.org http://www.kubuntu.org
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: componentfactory.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 3013 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070527/dc002503/attachment.diff>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070527/dc002503/attachment.sig>