KParts::ComponentFactory to namespace?

[Simon Hausmann]

On Sunday 27 May 2007 01:50:59 Alex Merry wrote:
> Is it OK to make KParts::ComponentFactory into a namespace, to stop
> anyone trying to instantiate it?
>
> It just has five static template methods and, given the existence of
> KParts::Factory, I can't imagine that there'll be any need to make it
> into a real class at any point.

It used to be a namespace because of a compiler bug in gcc 2.96 IIRC. But 
since we don't support that compiler anymore anyway (KDE's minimum is at 
least gcc 3.3) I agree with changing it to a namespace.

Simon

P.S.: Nice cleanups in kdelibs!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070527/e9e84e1e/attachment.sig>