Strigi Analyzers

[Tobias G. Pfeiffer]

Hi!

On Wednesday 21 March 2007, 14:48, George Goldberg wrote:
> There's no point in us wasting effort doing the same thing... Should I
> continue with the Cpp one, with a view to adding indexing of class
> names, included files etc, or are you already there with it?

No, just continue with what you do, I'm sure I'll find a similar task for me, 
like indexing Python, Java, whatever :-)

By the way, is there a possibility to have strigi also use other source of 
information about a file than the file contents themselves? More 
specifically, I think of using the digikam database to associate image files 
with the information stored in digikam.

> Also, I posted a cpp analyzer as a throughanalyzer a couple of days
> ago, and someone suggested that it would be better as a line analyzer,
> as that option is now available.

I saw both that and the corresponding wiki page just after I sent my mail... 
good work, anyway :-) I'll have to dig further into that whole 
analyzer-stuff, I suppose.

Bye
Tobias

-- 
design the future... now!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070321/36674dbd/attachment.sig>