proposed KAction/KActionCollection API changes

[Simon Hausmann]

Hi Ellis,

welcome back! :)

On Wednesday 03 January 2007 00:21, Ellis Whitehead wrote:
[...]
> > 3) KActionCollection supports QActions and also provides configurable
> > shortcuts for them, through the use of dynamic properties.
>
> Seems like a good idea, but where exactly do you see the advantage?
> Also, considering dynamic properties, how would QAction be more
> limited than KAction (other than the different key handling backends)?

Technically I don't think there is any limitation, especially not since 
KAction inherits from QAction right now and QAction has lost most of its 
logic in favor of just being a container for properties.

Simon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070103/d6b47fd5/attachment.sig>