[RFC] SVN Guidelines.

[Alexander Neundorf]

On Tuesday 27 February 2007 21:59, Tom Albers wrote:
> Op di 27 feb 2007 21:50 schreef u:
> > My first objection is to /tags/unmaintained. I don't like those at all.
> > Simply svn rm the old code and add it to the wiki page. But there are
> > advantages to doing that -- i.e., you can use websvn to look at the
> > experimental code without having to go to the wiki and then enter the
> > revision number.
>
> That was my best argument for /tags/unmaintained, you can very easy look up
> some code, grep through it or retrieve a single file through websvn. Also
> reviving an application is imho more likely to happen when it's somewhere
> obvious and not rm'ed. Revisions on a wiki is not so obvious I think.

I think so too.

> > In any event, /tags/unmaintaned[34] is unnecessary. Maybe we can have
> > subdirs, but mostly I don't think it would matter.
>
> i dont mindeither way, as long as there is a separation.

/me agrees

Bye
ALex
-- 
Work: alexander.neundorf AT jenoptik.com - http://www.jenoptik-los.de
Home: neundorf AT kde.org                - http://www.kde.org
      alex AT neundorf.net               - http://www.neundorf.net