[RFC] SVN Guidelines.

[Michael Pyne]

On Tuesday 27 February 2007 16:22, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 February 2007 21:59, Tom Albers wrote:
> > Op di 27 feb 2007 21:50 schreef u:
> > > My first objection is to /tags/unmaintained. I don't like those at all.
> > > Simply svn rm the old code and add it to the wiki page. But there are
> > > advantages to doing that -- i.e., you can use websvn to look at the
> > > experimental code without having to go to the wiki and then enter the
> > > revision number.
> >
> > That was my best argument for /tags/unmaintained, you can very easy look
> > up some code, grep through it or retrieve a single file through websvn.
> > Also reviving an application is imho more likely to happen when it's
> > somewhere obvious and not rm'ed. Revisions on a wiki is not so obvious I
> > think.
>
> I think so too.

Also I don't think there's any kind of substantial cost associated with having 
the tag retained in subversion.  It's still on disk somewhere so it may as 
well have an easily accessible name.

Regards,
 - Michael Pyne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070227/d759a951/attachment.sig>