Closing all bugs?

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Thomas Zander wrote:
> start triaging them a bit more aggressively.

yep.

i just don't see this happening with 23k/15k reports. it's too big a mountain 
to climb.

then again, without a triage push starting at zero won't matter either. 

with a triage team starting at zero (with a library to fall back on, as i 
recommended earlier) would probably make a huge difference 2-3 years from 
hence.

if i hadn't taken on so many things to date, i'd charge ahead with this. but i 
have, so i won't. i can only draw lines in the dust and hope someone will at 
this point move forward. 

but i would never expect success with the current mountain of neglect. let 
them take charge of a new field, not the errors of their forebears. is there 
anyone one who would lead?

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Trolltech
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20071211/7ea5f471/attachment.sig>