kdelibs coding style
Kevin Krammer
kevin.krammer at gmx.at
Mon Jul 24 12:48:35 BST 2006
On Monday 24 July 2006 12:50, Thomas Zander wrote:
> The proposal was made in a very clear way to _avoid_ discussing
> particularities.
It's a proposal, it is intended to be discussed, isn't it?
> I fully support his actions in this thread, and I think its a shame that
> there were so many people who basically ignored his wise words and went
> on discussing the actual style anyway. Killing this proposal from getting
> a meritocratic Ok in the process.
So far most developers seem to be in favor of adopting the rule set, _despite_
having their concerns about one or another detail.
I'd rather know that it is an acceptable compromise than being fooled into
thinking everybody thinks it's jsut shiny.
Cheers,
Kevin
--
Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer at gmx.at>
Qt/KDE Developer, Debian User
Moderator: www.mrunix.de (German), www.qtcentre.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060724/d8d58cd3/attachment.sig>
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list