kde4 application disable to compile for the moment

[Laurent Montel]

On Sunday 16 July 2006 17:50, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Laurent Montel -- Sunday 16 July 2006 17:33:
>
> * > On Sunday 16 July 2006 17:18, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > qt-copy's apply_patches doesn't work.
> >
> > Work fine.
> > all patch which necessary are already apply into qt-copy source.
>
> I tried for several days now, and until yesterday it didn't work.

> I don't 
> consider the patches essential, well, most of them. But I'm trying since
> many weeks to compile qt-copy, kdelibs, kdebase, ... and as long as I
> couldn't get these three to work even halfway, I didn't see the point
> in messing with code in e.g. kdeartwork. Note that I don't complain
> about that. *I* am patient. (Also, I don't claim that there's a lot
> of my code in KDE. Most of it is already ported

Into kdeartwork I speak about kwin-style no ?

> or didn't need to get 
> ported. There's only a screensaver missing.

I know I ported other screensaver.

> I basically needed to 
> rewrite it, and did already. But I can't do the final bits, as there
> is no working screensaver to look into as a template.
>
> > we are able to launch application.
>
> Sure, but a screensaver needs some framework, no? And even if not:
> why do suddenly single apps need to be ported already, when kdebase
> isn't even?

kdebase was ported.
All compiled

> > And during trysil week we fixed kde start => so we are able to launch all
> > kdesktop/kicker etc.
>
> I wasn't there and nobody informed me.  :-P
>
> > For the moment any application we removed but all application which is
> > not ported is disable.
>
> That's OK. But you said:
> | so we can perhaps removed them from kde module
>
> which I find a bit premature, if not offensive.

I just ask if maintainer will want to remove them from module.
I will not remove it by himself.

> m.