kdevelop (Re: Proposal to plan for "Milestone Releases" on the way to KDE4)

[Guillaume Laurent]

Richard Dale wrote:
> On Friday 27 January 2006 22:08, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
>   
>> Bottom line is that the amount of effort required to turn Eclipse into a
>> good KDE IDE is very small compared to the one required for putting
>> KDevelop even halfway close to the feature level of Eclipse.
>>     
> Since when is Eclipse a good C++ IDE?
Since Eclipse 3.1 and CDT 3.0.
> Ask Alex Dymo who has worked on both 
> improving Eclipse C++ support, and KDevelop - how came he isn't fazed by 
> Eclipse?
May be he didn't try the latest version at the time, I don't know. I 
gave Eclipse/C++ a try a few months ago, and it was already *way* beyond 
kdevelop. If it weren't for the lack of KDE/Qt support, I'd have 
switched from XEmacs in a heartbeat.