Backporting trunk Kate to kdelibs4_snapshot

[Albert Astals Cid]

I agree updating the snapshot is a good thing and that 2 weeks sounds like a 
sensible time.

Albert

A Divendres 16 Setembre 2005 22:35, Olivier Goffart va escriure:
> Le Jeudi 15 Septembre 2005 22:33, Adam Treat a écrit :
> > Is it ok if I backport trunk/kdelibs/kate and a few other files against
> > kdelibs4_snapshot?
>
> How often should kdelibs_snapshot be merged with trunk ?
> I think 2 weeks are fine.
>
> The objective of kdelibs_snapshot is AFAIK, to not have a moving target.
> Having something which change every two weeks is still a moving target, but
> less moving, and let application developper to port their application under
> a recent kdelibs (understand: not an obsolete kdelibs)
>
> An intermediate solution would be to have a tag every two week, with a
> different version.
> i.e  /branches/kdelibs_snapshot/20050916/
>
>
> But i really think we should do something, or we will port application to
> obsolete API, which is not a good thing.
>
> don't you think ?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050916/35095eda/attachment.sig>