pynm0001 at comcast.net
Sun Oct 2 22:06:27 BST 2005
On Sunday 02 October 2005 05:11, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> There's always much talk about how open source software might help
> especially in poor countries. But if the software requires up-to-date
> hardware this argument is mainly void :-/
That's a valid point, but if running one more malloc() is seriously that much
of a burden then why are we splitting hairs about D pointers when there is a
whole slew of code in kdelibs that could probably be optimized? People have
already pointed out that D pointers may not be a good idea in classes that
*have to be* speed-intensive. But for the vast majority of classes one extra
malloc() will not be noticable.
As far as the indirection cost goes, what I remember from my CS courses seems
to indicate that it should be an amortized cost of about zero on modern
systems (and by modern I mean > i486). Otherwise wouldn't we be having
massive problems with the dynamic PLT tables and other fun things that .so
files use nowadays?
- Michael Pyne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the kde-core-devel