KConfigXT generated private members

Mon May 30 19:13:37 BST 2005

On Monday 30 May 2005 07:20, mETz wrote:
> Think about when kconfig_compiler suddenly changes, it will also change
> your API.

it shouldn't "suddenly" change, IMHO. this would mean a change in policy for 
kconfig_compiler.

> Or think about different kconfig_compiler versions producing 
> different code.

all that matters is the public method signatures and the data members. we 
already know how to keep BC for libraries, this could be added to 
kconfig_compiler, no?

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050530/b5de28fa/attachment.sig>