What is a KDE app (was Re: Image viewer for KDE4 (Re: KView for KDE4?))

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Thursday 23 June 2005 11:09, Nicolas Goutte wrote:
> On Thursday 23 June 2005 18:40, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 June 2005 05:33, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
>
> (...)
>
> > are there any other specific reasons for doing KEG releases in tandem
> > with KDE releases?
>
> The problem of releasing with KDE is that translators cannot improve the
> translation due to lack of time.

just to be clear for my poor easily-confused little mind ;) you are saying 
that it would better if the KEG releases were NOT released along with KDE? 
and that it would better if KEG releases were staggered between KDE releases?

so something like:

Week 0: KDE x.y.0 released
Week 6: KDE x.y.1 released
Week 16: KEG x.y.0 released
Week 22: KDE x.y.2 released
Week 32: KEG x.y.1 released
Week 38: KDE x.(y+1).0 released
Week 44: KDE x.(y+1).1 released
Week 54: Keg x.(y+1).0 released

note that i've assumed some sort of version number harmony here so that users 
can say "oh, if i have KEG x.y i need at least KDE x.y"... the week 54 
release in the above could just as easily be KEG x.y.3 if there was no dep on 
KDE x.(y+1) ... or perhaps there's some other more sane way of doing the 
version numbering, i'm not release management guru (he says, glancing over at 
coolo, waldo, david and binner ;)

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050623/92f77bdc/attachment.sig>