Standard gettext PO format

[Chusslove Illich]

> [: Nicolas Goutte :]
> May be the Gettext formula of kdelibs.po could be used. That would not
> need another message but would not allow a free choice like Gettext
> offers either.

You mean if we use Gettext, or if we stick to current code with small 
modifications? In first case, I don't know whether it can be done without 
serious tinkering with Gettext internals. In second case, we'd need custom 
plural expression parser.

Either way, I'm not too happy. Correct plural header is needed in every 
file any way, for different PO tools to do their job. For PO files in KDE 
repository, check_po_files could keep watch of correct headers.

-- 
Chusslove Illich (Часлав Илић)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20051230/ce10dcf2/attachment.sig>