Office/ and Utilities/ menu reorganization

[Michael Nottebrock]

On Thursday, 11. August 2005 22:27, Nicolas Goutte wrote:
> On Thursday 11 August 2005 19:28, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 10. August 2005 22:11, Nicolas Goutte wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 10 August 2005 19:49, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, 9. August 2005 20:18, Andras Mantia wrote:

> So were is the new developer for for examples man:, ftp:, fish: (the list
> is far from being exhaustive).

Again, you're citing software that's already within KDE (and you're implying 
that it's not getting enough attention) for making the point that software in 
KDE has a better chance of being maintained because the developers don't have 
to care about making releases. This doesn't make sense. Fish:/ started out as 
a third party application btw.

> Assuming you want to kick out KFloppy for example, it means that the poor
> new developer who would take the work on KFloppy would not only became a
> developer and the new maintainer but would also need to be the release
> manager of KFloppy. 

Yes.

> So the probability is clearly near 0. 

I have no idea how you're arriving at that conclusion. FWIW, would you be sad 
to see kfloppy go and never come back?

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050812/d3099867/attachment.sig>