Thoughts on the systray II.

[George Staikos]

On Monday 18 April 2005 11:34, Lubos Lunak wrote:

> > > 4) not using the systray for daemons, quick access and such stuff,
> > > instead simply not having any GUI for those, or using applets/whatever.
> > > I'm not actually sure what was the opinion on this.
> >
> >   What do you suggest for KWallet?  It's important to know that a wallet
> > is open.  Likewise for the print manager...
>
>  Honestly, I don't know. Unlike Aaron, I don't want just to solve the
> "systray mechanism sucks" problem, I also want to solve the "systray
> concept sucks" problem. That's why I try to split the random mess there's
> currently in the systray into several consistent groups. Well, see my
> answer to Aaron.

  Right.  I like your approach.

>  Hmm. Both KWallet and the print manager look like a mixture of 1), because

[...]

> are here" and "notifications are here". But KWallet or the print manager
> kind of fit in both. Maybe they could go to 1), but I'm really unsure now.

   You see the problem clearly. :-)

-- 
George Staikos
KDE Developer				http://www.kde.org/
Staikos Computing Services Inc.		http://www.staikos.net/