[MAJOR BUG] g++ 2.95.x generates invalid code for KDE 3.3.0

[Maksim Orlovich]

> On Sunday 19 September 2004 19:26, Leo Savernik wrote:
>> It is a two-fold pain. Upgrrading
>> (1) forces one to recompile large parts of the system
>> (2) makes development much slower (gcc-2.95 is twice as fast as any
>> gcc-3.x)
>
> Serious question: How many KDE developers are still using gcc-2.95 on
> Linux? And how many are still using it because it compiles faster than
> gcc-3.x?

Scott Wheeler (who is away on vacation ATM, so is unlikely to answer
himself) uses it, and IIRC, for the very reason of speed