Proposal: modeless KInputDialog boxes
bastian at kde.org
Fri May 7 11:28:20 BST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
modeless tends to imply asynchronous, so I don't think you will come very far
with static functions. Isn't it just as easy to make your own dialog from
kdialogbase for BR75959?
On Fri May 7 2004 06:16, Matt Rogers wrote:
> KDesktop bug 75959 stems from the fact that there are no modeless versions
> of the KInputDialog boxes, so I thought that I would make an attempt at
> adding a few of them. I'd like to know what people think of the idea and
> also get a question answered before I get started on a patch (because I
> have a feeling it might take me awhile).
> Currently, KInputDialog handling is all done via static functions. I'd like
> to do the same thing with the modeless versions, but I'm not completely
> sure that handling signals and slots would work if the modeless versions of
> the KInputDialog boxes are static functions. Is it possible to handle
> signals and slots when using a static function like KInputDialog::getText?
bastian at kde.org | SUSE Linux 9.1 Order Now! | bastian at suse.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the kde-core-devel