Proposal: modeless KInputDialog boxes

[Waldo Bastian]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

modeless tends to imply asynchronous, so I don't think you will come very far 
with static functions. Isn't it just as easy to make your own dialog from 
kdialogbase for BR75959?

Cheers,
Waldo

On Fri May 7 2004 06:16, Matt Rogers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> KDesktop bug 75959 stems from the fact that there are no modeless versions
> of the KInputDialog boxes, so I thought that I would make an attempt at
> adding a few of them. I'd like to know what people think of the idea and
> also get a question answered before I get started on a patch (because I
> have a feeling it might take me awhile).
>
> Currently, KInputDialog handling is all done via static functions. I'd like
> to do the same thing with the modeless versions, but I'm not completely
> sure that handling signals and slots would work if the modeless versions of
> the KInputDialog boxes are static functions.  Is it possible to handle
> signals and slots when using a static function like KInputDialog::getText?
>
> Matt

- -- 
bastian at kde.org  |   SUSE Linux 9.1 Order Now!   |  bastian at suse.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAm2TEN4pvrENfboIRAjwuAKCP9wa3j42fI7Ib7NTILeS20nIbJwCfarQd
BbqQ11wOAEpTZgBszMSlfoM=
=4ivo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----