README.qtcopy: -no-stl or no -no-stl?

[Leo Savernik]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am Dienstag, 20. Januar 2004 10:30 schrieb Bo Thorsen:
[...]
> And another thing: Why the "-no-exceptions"? Ever since gcc 3.0.0 was out,
> having exceptions support compiled in is free of runtime costs, up until
> the point where you actually throw an exception. If people want to write
> code that uses exceptions, why not allow them to do so? [...]

Ever considered the fact that some people still use gcc-2.95? I don't object 
suggesting enabling exceptions for gcc-3+, but it must not lead to require 
Qt+kdelibs+kdebase be built with exception support unconditionally.

mfg
	Leo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQFADRwoj5jssenUYTsRArxaAJwK49Yv7bS41rR1haC+uBTa0YnirwCglOTO
NZRt8nK4kjUYlyYmKHUb1eE=
=d6tI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----