Relevancy of Preferences KCM

[Russell Miller]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 15 February 2004 18:40, George Staikos wrote:

>   Absolutely not.  These are very important settings for people on various
> sorts of unreliable (or particularly reliable) networks, as well as those
> behind all sorts of firewalls.  The defaults are sensible already and very
> few people need to use this KCM - so it just sits there unused and
> unobtrustive.  Nevertheless, people do need it.  There is no reason to
> remove it, and perhaps reason to add more to it.

To expand on this, I think looking for things to remove is generally a pretty 
bad idea, and should be avoided if at all possible - if you must, obsolete 
them so they no longer make sense.  Otherwise, just leave it alone.

I know I get very cranky when someone decides that they know more than me what 
I need and removes something that I've been using.

- --Russell

- -- 
18:45:54 up 8 days, 7:28, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.12, 0.14

Russell Miller - rmiller at duskglow.com - Somewhere near Sioux City, IA.
Youth cannot know age, but age is guilty if it forgets youth
    - Professor Dumbledore
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAMBM8URTA4VCI9OARAoNtAJ9eWYdl9YHBtarLao4VrDyR1H8g6ACfUR+k
Chl30OmEL8Q09KA1BhTgZO0=
=hrqh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----