Moving kdcop

[Russell Miller]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 02 February 2004 03:59 pm, Frans Englich wrote:

> Why not kdesdk - kdcop is afterall for mixing with kde internals, you only
> need it if you develop an KDE app, or something equally "internal".
> Putting it in kdeutils helps a little, but users would still have it
> installed since kdeutils is basically mandatory for a decent KDE session.
>
I think that's a red herring.  To me, the only benefit to taking it out of 
kdebase is a smaller kdebase package to download, and taking a bit less time 
compiling the module.  Those are compelling reasons.

And no, you don't only need it if you develop a KDE app.  It's more a "power 
user" tool than a "developer" tool.  Developers would be using the command 
line :)

- --Russell

> And what about kdebase/kdebugdialog? kdesdk?
>
> Cheers,
>
> 		Frans

- -- 
15:57:30 up 11 days, 20:49, 1 user, load average: 0.12, 0.14, 0.15

Russell Miller - rmiller at duskglow.com - Somewhere near Sioux City, IA.
Youth cannot know age, but age is guilty if it forgets youth
    - Professor Dumbledore
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAHshoURTA4VCI9OARAg17AJ9D3VD+vqtJWx8/ew0cK/BshkX0jwCbB0KF
iQGJ/ugIVyCUEk/WYdRtclw=
=M0r7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----