How did akregator come into kdepim?

[David Pashley]

On Dec 12, 2004 at 21:12, Cornelius Schumacher praised the llamas by saying:
> On Sunday 12 December 2004 16:44, George Staikos wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 December 2004 07:08, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> > >
> > > You should have talked to the kdepim people before doing this. It's
> > > completely unacceptable to have a discussion on the mailing lists
> > > with a clear agreement how to proceed and then privately do
> > > something different.
> >
> >    More unacceptable than breaking the build?
> 
> Come on, fixing the build doesn't prevent you from sending a mail 
> explaining the reasons for moving akgregator to kdepim. It probably 
> would also have been more efficient to ask for help instead of just 
> committing stuff.
> 
> Moving applications around affects a lot of developers. This has to be 
> discussed openly.
> 
> >    What does it matter if 

Including packagers. Certainly from Debian's point of view this will
result in adding new Depends, Conflicts etc dependency information and
cause new bugs. I hope this is targeted at 3.4 and not 3.3.x.

-- 
David Pashley
david at davidpashley.com
Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.