Proposal: Encouraging DB-using applications

[Mathieu Chouinard]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

[Guillaume Laurent reply]:
> On Sunday 21 September 2003 23:39, Roberto Alsina wrote:
> > Now, your position is that there is no such app to be written. I gave a
> > few examples, Andras mentioned one. Those apps do exist.
>
> My position is that DBs are, more frequently than not, used as the wrong
> solution to a problem, and are inherently much more complex and less
> reliable than simpler solutions. I don't disagree that apps needing a DB
> can be written, I do disagree that they are as common as you seem to think.
>
> > Costs almost nothing. It's tiny. It's written. It's 1200 lines. How buggy
> > can it be? ;-)
>
> You tell me :-). How well tested is it ?
>
> > Benefits: you say none. I say some.
>
> No, I agree there are benefits. What I'm worried about are the downsides,
> even more so since you seem to be overly confident on the issue, and
> advocated the use of DBs in applications where they really didn't belong.
> Two sure signs of the "I've got a new toy I absolutely must play
> with"-syndrome. No offense meant, but you do trigger a few alarm bells
> here.
the thing is that KDE is also a framework we use to develop application ... 
and I think a standardized way to access DB (not just relational one but all 
kind) would be benificial for KDE, even gnome got libgda, windows got ODBC 
(or whatever is called know). 
Mathieu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/biTziMDNv/kQnRMRAsAkAJ0YGrz/loQ4GRqa4IWFjvLpVk0HWQCgjd5L
644qgeR9k0UrlGNS7H6TodQ=
=yuHe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----