dropping kmidi?

[Maksim Orlovich]

On Tue, 27 May 2003, Neil Stevens wrote:
> I say put kmidi maintainership on the jobs file, and let the word spread 
> around that if nobody takes over and shapes it up, kmidi will be dropped.  
> If the first 3.2 beta comes and nobody does start caring for it, drop it.
> 
> Why wait so long?  Software synth allows everyone to use it, but kmid's 
> dependence on hardware makes it less generally useful.  So I suppose if 
> someone slapped some optional software synth into kmid, then we'd be fine, 
> too. :-)

Speaking of which, can anyone who has HW synth actually run kmid w/o it 
crashing? There are bug reports to the opposite..