template based d pointer class

[Alexander Kellett]

On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 04:23:54AM +0200, Zack Rusin wrote:
> On Saturday 17 May 2003 14:53, Alexander Kellett wrote:
> > any thoughts on the following. would make it
> > much easier to define private data members when
> > no d pointer was added at class invention.
> 
> In general I think it's a cool gimmick but don't see a larger need for 
> it. In all core libs we already have d-pointers so its use would be 
> heavily limited.

"all" -> "not the one i'm working on" :)

ok. i'll just leave it in the already written code for the 
moment and remove it for 4.0. thanks for the input everyone!

mvg,
Alex