template based d pointer class

Zack Rusin zack at kde.org
Wed May 21 03:23:54 BST 2003

On Saturday 17 May 2003 14:53, Alexander Kellett wrote:
> any thoughts on the following. would make it
> much easier to define private data members when
> no d pointer was added at class invention.

In general I think it's a cool gimmick but don't see a larger need for 
it. In all core libs we already have d-pointers so its use would be 
heavily limited.


More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list