glib in kdesupport: yes or no?
crossfire at babylon2k.de
Mon Mar 10 23:53:55 GMT 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > So how is the KDE requirement of kdelibs being LGPL (X11, BSD, etc,
> > > and explicitely _not_ GPL) any different?
> > Have I said they should switch gnome libs to GPL ? We use qt, which
> > is GPL and our libs are lgpl, where is there the problem :/
> Qt surely doesn't fall into the category of libs that'd live outside of
> the gnome equivalent of kdelibs, does it?
Why not ? It lives outside kdelibs, why should it be considered to be part of
the "gnomelibs" equivalent ? Does we consider qt to be part of kdelibs ? And
if yes, since when ?
KDE Developer, kde.org Co-Maintainer
http://www.babylon2k.de, cullmann at kde.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the kde-core-devel