glib in kdesupport: yes or no?

[Marc Mutz]

On Monday 10 March 2003 20:09, Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> On Monday 10 March 2003 20:30, Marc Mutz wrote:
> > On Monday 10 March 2003 16:30, Christoph Cullmann wrote:
<snip>
> > > but don't want to link against a gpl
> > > lib, amusing, at least in my eyes :)
<snip>
> > So how is the KDE requirement of kdelibs being LGPL (X11, BSD, etc,
> > and explicitely _not_ GPL) any different?
>
> Have I said they should switch gnome libs to GPL ? We use qt, which
> is GPL and our libs are lgpl, where is there the problem :/
<snip>

Qt surely doesn't fall into the category of libs that'd live outside of 
the gnome equivalent of kdelibs, does it?

Marc

-- 
Mutig warf sich die kleine Überwachungskamera zwischen Täter und Opfer!
                                        --Rena Tangens / FoeBuD e.V.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20030310/2ed8a822/attachment.sig>