Reason for -no-stl in qt-copy configure recommendation?

[Stephan Kulow]

On Monday 28 April 2003 20:58, Christian Loose wrote:
> I know it's not a strong argument, but maybe STLport (http://www.stlport.org) 
> could help on those non gcc/linux platforms with broken STL. They have a 
> pretty long list of supported platforms 
> (http://www.stlport.org/doc/platforms.html) and they are open-source.

Possibly, but it doesn't matter for this very discussion. We use STL in KDE anyway,
it's just a matter if we want to allow mixed containers. And I still can't see why not.
I find most arguments for -no-stl pretty weak.

Greetings, Stephan