Reason for -no-stl in qt-copy configure recommendation?

[Christian Loose]

Am Montag, 28. April 2003 20:47 schrieb Marcus Camen:
[snip]
>
> I want to stress this. The degree of support for the STL is quite different
> on different UNIX platforms. Some features are simply not implemented
> others are buggy.
> To work with QT is really great on those platforms because QTL is something
> you can rely on.  The STL implementaion is different everywhere --- and you
> don't know to what extend.
>
> @George: I feel you pain...   :-)
>
> --
> Marcus

I know it's not a strong argument, but maybe STLport (http://www.stlport.org) 
could help on those non gcc/linux platforms with broken STL. They have a 
pretty long list of supported platforms 
(http://www.stlport.org/doc/platforms.html) and they are open-source.

Christian