Proposal for KControl

[David Pashley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 30 June 2002 6:04 am, Charles Samuels wrote:
> lørdag 29 juni 2002, 05:02 pm, skrev Aaron J. Seigo:
> > > Why would a user configure kspell if they don't run it ? :)
> >
> > heh.. of course they wouldn't, but expecting a user to figure out that
> > the way to configure it is to run a spell check on a document and click
> > on configure is not a very logical set of steps to expect them to go
> > through.
> >
> > it would be like telling them that to configure kmail they first have to
> > send a dummy email.
>
> It's like telling them to Run KMail before they configure KMail.  No user
> would say "I want to spell check, I'll run kcontrol to configure it"

Would it not be possible to have kspell configured in both kcontrol and any 
app that requires spell checking, like how konqueror can be configured in 
konqueror and in kcontrol using the same dialogs.

- -- 
David Pashley
david at davidpashley.com
Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9HuzoYsCKa6wDNXYRAmZ4AJ98+p6auXGyXE6jSCV1kmX7enYP5ACfYyXT
K+NJLPKMq7jEKOxSUsGJjfg=
=MlTD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----