KGX? WTF?

[Hetz Ben Hamo]

Daniel,

I don't know who posted it on Linux&Main, but the whoever did it was stupid to 
bring this up. As much as I know the League was still just in discussing 
stages, nothing more then some emails swaps...

Personally I don't think that KGX thing is needed (and I object to grant the 
GNU thing an honour in a name like KGX) and I explained myself there. I don't 
think that we need this thing at all since (as much as I know) KDE is aiming 
to be a solution not only for Linux, but for other unices/unices-clones as 
well..

This is of course - just my personal opinion. I think that the situation 
should stay as it is now. KDE is well known world-wide, users knows about it, 
media knows about it.

Hetz

On Friday 26 July 2002 01:15, Daniel Naber wrote:
> On Thursday 25 July 2002 23:50, Shawn Gordon wrote:
> > There isn't enough meat in the story to really understand what is going
> > on, but it seems that diluting years of work to establish the KDE
> > "brand" to through it out the door to do what appears to be appeasing
> > RMS seems foolhardy to me.
>
> Yeah, let's all bash the League again!
>
> Ever heard of LAMP (=Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP)? Does the Apache group
> complain that "LAMP" is called the way it is? I don't think so.
>
> Regards
>  Daniel