KDE 3.1: delayed

[Daniel Stone]

On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 03:22:24PM +0100, Waldo Bastian scrawled:
> Security fixes for what? I think it is more important to release a KDE 3.0.6 
> or KDE 2.2.3 than KDE 3.1.
> 
> Reading some of the comments about the lack of binary packages for the RCs I 
> don't think many users will understand a KDE 3.1 in source only. KDE 3.1 is 
> something to be proud of, we should release it properly, not just "sort of".
> 
> I am strongly in favour of delaying it till January.

I agree sincerely. Since it's a major release, not just a point release,
we'll get extensive coverage on this, and we don't want to fuck it up.
It's that simple.

-- 
Daniel Stone 	     <daniel at raging.dropbear.id.au>             <dstone at kde.org>
Developer - http://kopete.kde.org, http://www.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20021207/db12cf79/attachment.sig>