Improving Bugzilla Status Names

[Andrew Crouthamel]

I like OPENED as well.

-------- Original Message --------
On Sep 29, 2018, 6:17 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 9:44 AM Valorie Zimmerman
> <valorie.zimmerman at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 1:48 AM Luigi Toscano <luigi.toscano at tiscali.it> wrote:
>>>
>>> Kai Uwe Broulik ha scritto:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > > Here is my follow-up change recommendation based on feedback and research:
>>> > >
>>> > > UNCONFIRMED -> REPORTED
>>> > > WONTFIX -> INTENTIONAL
>>> > > INVALID -> NOTABUG
>>> >
>>> > one issue I'm having with "REPORTED" is that it shows up as "REPO" in the list
>>> > and can easily be confused with "REOP" for "REOPENED". Perhaps we need
>>> > something different for Reopened then.
>>>
>>> If we rename also that, we would have two bug names diverging from the other
>>> bug trackers, instead of just one. Moreover I find that there is no much to
>>> discuss on the appropriateness of REOPENED.
>>> I'd rather find an alternative for REPORTED, if this confusion is going to be
>>> an issue.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Luigi
>>
>>
>> OPENED ?
>
> Definitionally reported is definitely the right word to be using, but
> given that conflict/simiilarity between REPO/REOP I think opened is
> probably the best term we can get here.
> None of the synonyms for reported fit that's for sure.
>
>>
>> Valorie
>> --
>> http://about.me/valoriez
>>
>>
>
> Cheers,
> Ben
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/attachments/20180930/da2d48b5/attachment.htm>