Improving Bugzilla Status Names

[Ben Cooksley]

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 9:44 AM Valorie Zimmerman
<valorie.zimmerman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 1:48 AM Luigi Toscano <luigi.toscano at tiscali.it> wrote:
>>
>> Kai Uwe Broulik ha scritto:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >  > Here is my follow-up change recommendation based on feedback and research:
>> >  >
>> >  > UNCONFIRMED -> REPORTED
>> >  > WONTFIX -> INTENTIONAL
>> >  > INVALID -> NOTABUG
>> >
>> > one issue I'm having with "REPORTED" is that it shows up as "REPO" in the list
>> > and can easily be confused with "REOP" for "REOPENED". Perhaps we need
>> > something different for Reopened then.
>>
>> If we rename also that, we would have two bug names diverging from the other
>> bug trackers, instead of just one. Moreover I find that there is no much to
>> discuss on the appropriateness of REOPENED.
>> I'd rather find an alternative for REPORTED, if this confusion is going to be
>> an issue.
>>
>> --
>> Luigi
>
>
> OPENED ?

Definitionally reported is definitely the right word to be using, but
given that conflict/simiilarity between REPO/REOP I think opened is
probably the best term we can get here.
None of the synonyms for reported fit that's for sure.

>
> Valorie
> --
> http://about.me/valoriez
>
>

Cheers,
Ben