Improving Bugzilla Status Names
bcooksley at kde.org
Sat Sep 29 23:17:02 BST 2018
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 9:44 AM Valorie Zimmerman
<valorie.zimmerman at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 1:48 AM Luigi Toscano <luigi.toscano at tiscali.it> wrote:
>> Kai Uwe Broulik ha scritto:
>> > Hi,
>> > > Here is my follow-up change recommendation based on feedback and research:
>> > >
>> > > UNCONFIRMED -> REPORTED
>> > > WONTFIX -> INTENTIONAL
>> > > INVALID -> NOTABUG
>> > one issue I'm having with "REPORTED" is that it shows up as "REPO" in the list
>> > and can easily be confused with "REOP" for "REOPENED". Perhaps we need
>> > something different for Reopened then.
>> If we rename also that, we would have two bug names diverging from the other
>> bug trackers, instead of just one. Moreover I find that there is no much to
>> discuss on the appropriateness of REOPENED.
>> I'd rather find an alternative for REPORTED, if this confusion is going to be
>> an issue.
> OPENED ?
Definitionally reported is definitely the right word to be using, but
given that conflict/simiilarity between REPO/REOP I think opened is
probably the best term we can get here.
None of the synonyms for reported fit that's for sure.
More information about the kde-community