Improving Bugzilla Status Names

[Valorie Zimmerman]

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 1:48 AM Luigi Toscano <luigi.toscano at tiscali.it>
wrote:

> Kai Uwe Broulik ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> >
> >  > Here is my follow-up change recommendation based on feedback and
> research:
> >  >
> >  > UNCONFIRMED -> REPORTED
> >  > WONTFIX -> INTENTIONAL
> >  > INVALID -> NOTABUG
> >
> > one issue I'm having with "REPORTED" is that it shows up as "REPO" in
> the list
> > and can easily be confused with "REOP" for "REOPENED". Perhaps we need
> > something different for Reopened then.
>
> If we rename also that, we would have two bug names diverging from the
> other
> bug trackers, instead of just one. Moreover I find that there is no much
> to
> discuss on the appropriateness of REOPENED.
> I'd rather find an alternative for REPORTED, if this confusion is going to
> be
> an issue.
>
> --
> Luigi
>

OPENED ?

Valorie
-- 
http://about.me/valoriez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/attachments/20180929/5583695f/attachment.htm>