[kde-community] Differences between proposed vision drafts (or "inclusive" vs "focused")

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Thursday 04 February 2016 21:16:41 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> the vision draft we present here is not a long term vision which changes the
> future of computing.
> It presents ambitious, but realistic goals for the next few years.
> Currently KDE applications and the desktop are successful on desktop Linux
> (and BSD etc.). But there is so much territory to conquer beyond that, while
> (for now) staying focused on GUIs.
> Let's make KDE applications as well known as Firefox or LibreOffice.
> 
> (This also implies that a vision statement needs updating over the years as
> circumstances change.)

Please (re-)read
https://topnonprofits.com/examples/vision-statements/
and tell me which of those 30 vision statements you think need "updating over 
the years as circumstances change."

As I wrote in my other message, I believe that what you propose is more a 
mission statement. And mission statements do indeed need to be updated from 
time to time.


Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/attachments/20160205/af07caef/attachment.sig>