[kde-community] Bikeshedding - our strength apparently *sigh*

Kevin Krammer krammer at kde.org
Sat Sep 19 18:25:13 UTC 2015

On Saturday, 2015-09-19, 19:58:26, Eike Hein wrote:
> On 09/19/2015 07:52 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > You mean that a KDE project would ignore your review request it it comes
> > from reviewboard/phabricator?
> I think that's a realistic, even likely concern. We already
> know that some devs don't like using multiple code review
> sites concurrently from the gerrit and Phab trial runs, and
> it's conceivable that some developers might prefer GitHub to
> Phabricator. "Please file this on GitHub because I don't look
> at Phab" would be a matter of time.

I don't find that likely.
The trial runs were a different thing, equally valid alternatives.

Saying "I don't look at the KDE review tool" would be like saying "I am not 
interested in your patch".

A maintainer can always not accept a patch.

Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
KDE user support, developer mentoring
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/attachments/20150919/9bb49627/attachment.sig>

More information about the kde-community mailing list