RFC: replacing MacroLogFeature.cmake with FeatureSummary.cmake

[Michael Jansen]

On Thursday 14 July 2011 10:49:50 Ian Wadham wrote:
> On 14/07/2011, at 5:16 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > What do you think of this ?
> > More wishes ?
> > Should it do it in a different way ?
> 
> Very nice.  I especially like the PURPOSE concept.
> 
> As we discussed before, in connection with use of OpenAL sound
> in some games, could it be possible to have grades of requirement
> in between REQUIRED and OPTIONAL?  They would not bomb out
> the cmake run, but should issue some stronger message that the
> requirement was not met than just saying it was "optional".

I would suggest RECOMMENDED. Like it works without but we think its really 
less useful then.

OPTIONAL would be stuff then that enabled additional functionality that is not 
really needed for all of us. like something that add iphone support. not 
everyone has one.

Mike