[Kde-accessibility] Patches for docs

[Bill Haneman]

On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 14:29, Lauri Watts wrote:
> On Monday 03 February 2003 03:32, you wrote:
> > Hi
> > Sounds like something I may actually be able to help with (at last ;-)
> > ) I would be pleased to help out with a KDE accessibility guide in any
> > way I can.
> >
> 
> Ok, consider yourself assimilated!
> 
> Here's the GNOME accesibility guide, which I'm looking at using as a base for 
> ideas:
> http://www.gnome.org/learn/access-guide/2.0/

A more up-to-date link is this one:

http://www.gnome.org/learn/sol-access-guide/2.0/

Despite being called "GNOME Accessibility for Solaris", the guide above
is 90% OS-independent and considerably expanded beyond the previous
guide.  The link above is the version of the Guide which is under active
development and which will be the basis of future versions of the
Accessibility Guide, with OS-specific references edited where
appropriate.

regards,

Bill

> I'm giving the link, because it took me a long time to find it.  Not very 
> accessible :)
> 
> Before I work up an outline, here's what I think should be decided:
> 
> Are the divisions between types of disabilities given sensible for KDE?
> I think yes, (and I also found, reading this document and comparing with KDE, 
> that KDE provides far more accessibility features built in than many might 
> think at first glance)   This could also provide something of a roadmap 
> pointing out things that are missing.
> 
> The rest, is very much a matter of getting the writing done.  I've put a (very 
> brief) outline here for discussion.
> 
> http://people.fruitsalad.org/lauri/accessibility_outline.html
> 
> Once it's been decided the general layout and topic divisions are fine, I'll 
> mark it all up, and we can get writing.
> 
> Regards,
-- 
Bill Haneman <bill.haneman@sun.com>